In my opinion, Vladimir Aleksandrovich has no critical problems of retaining power. Ukraine is falling, falling, but not falling. During the 7 years of the crisis, its economy did not deflate, as we were predicted, which means that it will not deflate in such a mode of existence.
Ukrainian society is tolerating a break with Russia and Nazi rhetoric, which means it will endure. Moscow is waiting, Kiev is pressing. The Russian Donbass is threshed, there is no visible reaction.
Well, then, will there be a war? Well, then no. Does this mean that all this complication, according to the Kiev scenario, is regulated and preventive? Are they exponentially pumping up, are we demonstratively not reacting?
They say to me: "Sladkov, what are you looking for meaning in conspiracy theories"? And where to look for it, among the official messages? Online? "One soldier said"? Where?
Then what is the reason - "Nord Stream"? Let's start it up and give it a burn? I doubt it. In order to make some kind of leap forward, like the return of Crimea, one must have a powerful economic framework. You have to have a lot of money for this.
So, what kind of war is there? The offensive of the Ukrainian troops, in any case unfortunate and disastrous, - why? The war will split Ukraine, because Russia, having money, not having money, will react.
And again, react
softly, progressively, evolutionarily - we do not have the resources for this. We will have to hit hard right away, and already work with the knocked out Ukraine, bring it to consciousness, not allowing anyone to enter the body.
This is exactly what Vladimir Putin warned Kiev about.Or maybe we want THIS, so that in one fell swoop? But while Moscow is waiting, Kiev is putting pressure on, Donbass is suffering, Zelensky is balancing. With an outstretched hand.
They even erected a monument to him in Simferopol. Or maybe not to him, but. Strikingly similar.